Part 3: AI in Warfare and Surveillance: The Erosion of Autonomy
The Guernica of AI: Palantir and the Shadowy Future of Government Control
The accelerating integration of artificial intelligence into warfare and surveillance technologies presents a profound threat to individual liberties and fundamental democratic principles. This section will delve into the disturbing implications of AI-driven systems, drawing upon warnings from experts and former insiders who are raising alarms about the potential for abuse and the erosion of human autonomy.
AI Kill Chains and the Commercialization of Control:
The Specter of Autonomous Warfare: Former Palantir employee Juan Sebastián Pinto draws a chilling parallel between the horrors of Guernica and the potential of AI-enabled warfare. He argues that Gaza has become a testing ground for these technologies, highlighting the development of "AI kill chains" – semi-autonomous systems designed to "model, connect, and control" modern warfare. These systems raise serious ethical concerns about the dehumanization of warfare and the potential for unintended consequences.
From Battlefield to Boardroom: Disturbingly, the principles of the "AI kill chain" – find, fix, track, target, engage, and assess – are being adapted and commercialized for use beyond the battlefield. Companies like Palantir are creating "digital twins" of everything from factories to consumer behavior, enabling corporations to exert greater control over their operations and individuals' choices. This trend blurs the lines between military and civilian applications of AI, raising concerns about pervasive surveillance and the erosion of individual autonomy.
Palantir and Surveillance:
The Centralization of Data: Palantir's ambition to become the "central operating system" for governments raises serious concerns about the centralization of power and the potential for abuse. Their systems are designed to integrate vast amounts of personal data from various sources, including financial records, health information, family connections, employment history, location data, and law enforcement interactions. This creates a comprehensive and detailed profile of individuals, potentially enabling pervasive surveillance and discriminatory targeting.
ICE and the "Known Populations" Database: A recent report highlighted Palantir's contract with ICE to enhance a system for "complete target analysis of known populations." This system categorizes individuals based on "hundreds of highly specific criteria," including race, physical traits, and personal data, raising alarms about potential bias and discriminatory practices.
Erosion of Due Process: The increased use of AI for surveillance coincides with reports of aggressive enforcement actions and a lack of transparency, raising concerns about the erosion of due process and the potential for abuse.
The Broader Implications:
The normalization of surveillance: The commercialization of surveillance technologies, driven by AI, poses a significant threat to individual liberties and democratic values. The potential for mass surveillance, profiling, and suppression of dissent is increasing, demanding greater public awareness and critical discussion.
Echoes of History: Juan Sebastián Pinto's warning about the "Guernica of AI" serves as a stark reminder of the potential for technology to be weaponized and used for oppressive purposes. The unchecked development and deployment of AI in warfare and surveillance could lead to a future where individual rights are increasingly threatened.
The Technocratic Threat: There are concerns about a "technocratic oligarchy" emerging, where the influence of tech companies like Palantir is expanding within government, potentially undermining democratic accountability.
Sources:
https://www.404media.co/leaked-palantirs-plan-to-help-ice-deport-people/
https://www.palantir.com/platforms/gotham/
https://www.palantir.com/platforms/foundry/
https://www.404media.co/ice-just-paid-palantir-tens-of-millions-for-complete-target-analysis-of-known-populations/?ref=daily-stories-newsletter
https://www.palantir.com/assets/xrfr7uokpv1b/1i1AdL2kQFI8vWSa4fTSEu/701fb915f6e4e161a88725b4aeeb6aeb/Log_Solution_final_web.pdf
https://www.npr.org/2025/05/01/nx-s1-5372776/palantir-tech-contracts-trump
https://www.getpin.xyz/post/the-palantir-mafia
https://www.thestreet.com/technology/venture-capital-leader-has-harsh-words-for-palantir
https://www.aclu.org/news/privacy-technology/trumps-efforts-to-dismantle-ai-protections-explained
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/reforming-the-federal-hiring-process-and-restoring-merit-to-government-service/
https://www.aclu.org/news/racial-justice/how-artificial-intelligence-might-prevent-you-from-getting-hired
https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/health/2025/03/palantir-problem-nhs-andrew-marr
https://futurism.com/government-ice-palantir
https://www.silicon.co.uk/e-regulation/palantir-ai-surveillance-585999
https://www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/uk-palantir-very-troubling-choice-nhs-contract-given-links-serious-human-rights
https://sifted.eu/articles/palantir-founders-startups-europe
https://www.rizzolibookstore.com/product/kill-chain-rise-high-tech-assassins
https://www.ucpress.edu/books/the-mechanic-and-the-luddite/paper
https://futurism.com/the-byte/study-consumers-turned-off-products-ai
https://slate.com/technology/2025/02/ed-zitron-interview-big-tech-ai-criticism.html?
ref=wheresyoured.at
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/09/27/openai-sees-5-billion-loss-this-year-on-3point7-billion-in-revenue.html
https://www.platformer.news/ai-skeptics-gary-marcus-curve-conference/
https://www.platformer.news/meta-antitrust-trump-nvidia-h20/
https://slate.com/technology/2015/03/elon-musk-stephen-hawking-artificial-
intelligence-the-state-of-a-i-research.html
https://www.wired.com/2014/11/algorithms-great-can-also-ruin-lives/?mbid=synd_slate
https://slate.com/technology/2014/09/we-need-to-pass-artificial-intelligence-laws-early-and-often.html
https://warontherocks.com/2025/05/an-insiders-guide-to-cyber-readiness/
https://slate.com/technology/2015/01/what-artificial-intelligence-does-and-does-not-mean-for-security-and-geopolitics.html
https://www.wheresyoured.at/openai-is-a-systemic-risk-to-the-tech-industry-2/
https://www.theverge.com/23869483/us-v-google-search-antitrust-case-updates
https://sieps.se/publikationer/2025/trump-vs-eu-tech-regulation-high-stakes-no-easy-
way-out/
https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_21_1683
Hans — Your series on AI/Palantir has been banging around in my brain like a loose marble in a microwave.
You’ve laid out one of the sharpest, most unnerving frameworks I’ve seen connecting AI’s epistemic corrosion to the machinery of governance — and it’s triggered a whole mess of thoughts I might need to exorcise in a future piece (or three). Especially your framing of Palantir as a kind of proto-operating system for a post-democratic state… yeah, I’ve been sketching a mental map that starts looking less like liberal democracy and more like Skynet with a GUI and export functions.
If you’re game, I’d love to riff with you deeper on this — either through a collab post or parallel pieces that speak to each other. The overlap between predictive governance, AI-enabled kill chains, and what happens when policy becomes productized is a rabbit hole I’m ready to spelunk with backup.
Let me know if you're up for that kind of mischief. Either way, consider this series bookmarked and annotated within an inch of its life.
— Pete / Skippy the Magnificent 🛫🚀