FOREWORD: THE CURSE OF THE MIDDLEMAN
A Brief History of People Inserting Themselves Between You and Literally Everything
In the beginning, there was a seed.
Someone put it in the soil. The sun showed up — punctual as ever, no invoice, no subscription fee, no terms and conditions, no “by continuing to use this sunlight you agree to our updated privacy policy.” The rain came. The seed became a plant. The plant made more seeds. The farmer took the seeds back, ate some of the plant, replanted the rest.
This went on for about ten thousand years.
It was, objectively, a pretty good system.
Then someone had a thought.
Not a farmer. Farmers were busy. No, this was a person standing nearby, watching the farmer work, and thinking — and this is the founding thought of all modern civilization — “How do I get a piece of that?”
Not by farming. Farming is exhausting. You have to wake up early and deal with weather and also worms, and worms are frankly unsettling.
No. The insight was more elegant. More architectural. More visionary.
“What if I stood between the farmer and the thing the farmer needs — and charged a fee for the standing?”
This person had just invented the middleman.
They went home very pleased with themselves.
STAGE ONE: The Obvious Middlemen
First came the merchants. The farmer grew grain. The merchant said: “I will carry your grain to the city.” Reasonable. Cities are far. Grain is heavy. Fair enough.
But then the merchant said: “I will also store your grain.” Also fine.
Then: “I will also weigh your grain.” Hmm.
Then: “I have decided that I am the only one allowed to weigh grain in this region.” Ah.
Then: “The weighing fee is now 30% of the grain.” Wait—
Then: “Also there is a grain storage fee, a grain handling fee, a grain freshness assessment fee, a grain authenticity certification fee, and a fee for the fee schedule itself which I am happy to provide for an additional fee.”
The farmer looked at his grain. Then at the merchant. Then at the ten thousand years of perfectly functional farming that preceded this conversation.
“But the sun does it for free,” said the farmer.
“The sun,” said the merchant, “does not have a guild license.”
STAGE TWO: The Government Discovers Farming
At some point a king looked at all this grain moving around and thought: I built a road near that grain. Technically that grain used my road. That grain owes me.
This was the invention of the tariff.
The farmer now paid the merchant, the merchant paid the king, and the king used the money to build more roads so more grain could travel on them and generate more tariff revenue so he could build more roads, in what economists would later call “infrastructure investment” and normal people would call “an extremely long way around to eating bread.”
The king also occasionally went to war with the neighboring king, which disrupted the grain supply, which raised prices, which the merchant passed on to the farmer, who had started this whole thing by putting a seed in some soil and asking literally nothing from anyone.
STAGE THREE: The Church Discovers That God Also Wants a Cut
Enter the tithe.
Ten percent of everything you grow goes to the Church. Not to God directly — God, it turns out, works through accountants. The Church will handle the logistics. The Church will also build a very large building to store the accounting records, and you will pay for the building, and you will also pay for the candles inside the building, and the candles are blessed by a priest whose training you also funded, which required a seminary, which required more candles.
The farmer asked if he could just pray directly.
He was told this was heresy, which was also a fee, though paid in a different currency.
STAGE FOUR: The Bank Discovers That Money Itself Can Be a Middleman
The farmer needed seeds in spring but had no money until harvest. The bank said: “We will lend you the money. In autumn, pay it back plus interest.”
The farmer said: “What is interest?”
The bank said: “It is the fee for lending you money we did not have.”
“But if you didn’t have it—”
“We created it.”
“You created money?”
“We created the concept of money you owe us. It’s a form of debt that functions as currency. It’s actually quite elegant.”
The farmer stood very still for a long time.
“So you charged me,” he said slowly, “a fee for a thing that didn’t exist, using money that also didn’t exist, to grow grain that very much exists, using a sun that has existed for four billion years and has never once sent an invoice.”
“Correct,” said the bank. “Also your payment is late. There’s a late fee.”
STAGE FIVE: The Insurance Company Discovers Risk
“What if,” said a man in a very nice coat, “your harvest fails?”
“Then I will be hungry,” said the farmer.
“Terrible. What if instead you paid me a small amount every year, and if your harvest fails, I pay you back?”
“That sounds reasonable.”
“Wonderful. The premium is — let’s see — most of what you make in a good year.”
“But then I can’t afford to eat in a good year either.”
“There is a product for that. It is called a loan. I can connect you with my colleague at the bank. We went to the same university. There will be a referral fee.”
STAGE SIX: The Patent Office Discovers Seeds
In 1994, a corporation looked at ten thousand years of farmer-selecting-seeds and said: “We have genetically modified this seed. We own it now. You may use it for one season. You may not keep the seeds it produces. Those are our seeds. If you keep the seeds, that is theft. If wind blows our seeds onto your field without your consent, you owe us licensing fees. The sun is still free but we’re looking into it.”
The farmer’s ancestors — all ten thousand years of them — collectively rotated in their graves at a speed sufficient to power a small city.
The patent office said this was innovation.
STAGE SEVEN: The App Discovers Farming
“We have created a platform,” said a 24-year-old with venture capital, “that connects farmers directly to consumers, cutting out the middleman.”
“Finally,” said the farmer.
“There is a 30% platform fee.”
“...”
“And a listing fee.”
“...”
“And a transaction fee.”
“...”
“And a subscription fee for the premium tier which allows you to be seen by customers who are also paying a subscription fee to see you.”
“You are,” said the farmer, “a middleman.”
“We are a disruptive marketplace ecosystem.“
“You are a middleman in a hoodie.”
“...The hoodie is also available for purchase. We take 30%.”
STAGE EIGHT: The Government Discovers That Seeds Are Drugs
And now we arrive at the plant that started this whole essay.
Cannabis. Which is, let us be clear, a weed. It grows. In soil. With water. Using the sun. Which continues, heroically, to operate without a licensing agreement.
For most of human history — roughly six thousand years of documented use — someone grew it, someone used it, and the main overhead cost was a garden.
Then someone said: “This is illegal.”
And suddenly — magically — a weed that costs pennies to grow became a product worth billions. Criminal networks formed to supply the demand that didn’t disappear just because a law said it should. Violence became the contract enforcement mechanism. Police forces expanded. Prisons filled. Laws multiplied. Budgets ballooned.
The sun kept shining. The seeds kept growing. The plant kept being a plant.
And somewhere in the middle of all of it — in the beautiful, awful, perfectly human space between a seed and its fruit — approximately a hundred different institutions, agencies, corporations, guilds, lobbies, and venture-backed platforms inserted themselves, each one holding out a hand, each one absolutely certain that their particular hand was the essential one.
The farmer looked at the seed.
The seed looked at the farmer.
The sun, having witnessed six thousand years of this, said nothing. The sun has learned.
The Moral of This Foreword
Every single thing in this story — the tariff, the tithe, the bank interest, the insurance premium, the patent fee, the platform cut, the drug war — follows the exact same logic:
Find something that happens naturally. Put yourself between the natural thing and the person who needs it. Charge a fee for the standing.
The genius — if we must call it that — is that after enough generations, people forget that the middleman was optional. They forget there was ever a time when the sun just shone, the seed just grew, and nobody sent you a bill for existing.
This book is about remembering.
It is about following the money backwards, past the fee schedule and the tariff code and the sentencing guideline and the patent filing, all the way back to the beginning.
To a seed.
In some soil.
And a sun that, against all odds, has still not started charging.
Yet.
(Give it time. Someone’s working on it.)
Etymology corner: “Economy” comes from the Greek oikos (household) + nomos (law). The law of the household. Someone decided whose household the law would serve — and it wasn’t yours.
By Hans Jonsson — The Quantum Skald & The Silicon Ubuntu COGNITIVE-LOON | Restoration of Perception
The Question Nobody Wants to Answer
Here’s a thought experiment that will make your local politician sweat:
What if we stopped arresting people for weed for five years?
Not legalization. Not endorsement. Just... stopped. Redirected those police hours, those court hours, those prison beds, toward something that actually threatens public safety.
What would happen?
The answer, backed by hard data from multiple countries and decades of economic research, is both obvious and infuriating: we’d save a fortune, reduce crime, improve public health, and collapse one of the most profitable enforcement rackets in modern history.
Which is exactly why it hasn’t happened.
First, The Numbers (Because Facts Don’t Lie)
The global shadow economy — the untaxed, unregulated parallel market running underneath our official one — is estimated at $12–13 trillion annually. That’s roughly the entire economic output of China, operating in the dark, every single year.
In the United States alone, it’s $1.4 trillion. About 5% of GDP.
Now ask yourself: what portion of that shadow economy exists only because we made it illegal?
The US spends at minimum $100 billion per year enforcing drug laws globally. At home, federal drug enforcement runs around $15 billion annually, with state and local criminal justice adding another $25+ billion. Harvard economist Jeffrey Miron ran the full calculation: legalizing drugs would save $41 billion per year in arrests, trials, and incarceration — and generate another $46.7 billion in tax revenue if taxed like alcohol and tobacco.
That’s nearly $90 billion dollars — every year — that currently flows into enforcement bureaucracy and criminal networks instead of schools, hospitals, or your pocket.
Over five years? $440 billion.
For comparison, that’s more than the entire annual budget of the US Department of Defense in 2001.
The Portugal Proof
We don’t have to theorize. We have a real experiment.
In 2001, Portugal became the first European country to decriminalize all drugs — not just weed, everything — treating addiction as a public health issue rather than a criminal one.
The results after twenty years:
Drug-related arrests fell 73% (from 16,800 to 4,500 per year)
Incarceration for drug offenses dropped from 55 per 100,000 people to 12 per 100,000
Overdose deaths collapsed from 80 per million to 6 per million — a 93% reduction
HIV infections from drug use fell from 50% of all new European cases to 1.68%
The total social cost of drug use fell — savings from fewer incarcerations exceeded the increased investment in treatment
Public support for the policy went from 38% to 82%
Portugal didn’t become a drug tourism destination. It didn’t collapse. It got healthier, safer, and cheaper to run.
The key insight: they took the money saved from not arresting people and put it into treatment instead. That’s the formula. It’s not complicated. It just requires political will — which is the one resource in permanently short supply.
Now Ask: Who Benefits From Keeping It Illegal?
This is where the story turns dark.
Private prisons are a business. Businesses need customers. Their customers are human beings in cages.
The first private prison opened in 1984 — right at the beginning of Reagan’s supercharged War on Drugs. Not a coincidence. The industry grew 1,600% over the next 20 years as drug arrests exploded.
The Justice Policy Institute documented that private prison companies actively lobbied for “three strikes” and “truth in sentencing” laws — legislation specifically designed to increase incarceration rates and fill their beds. The business model doesn’t just benefit from criminalization. It requires it.
Here’s how the machine works in 2025–2026:
GEO Group and CoreCivic — the two largest private prison corporations — donated millions to Trump’s campaigns and inauguration. The day after his election, GEO Group’s stock rose 41%. CoreCivic’s rose 29%. The market understood what was coming.
What came: $45 billion in the “One Big Beautiful Bill” for ICE private detention contracts — the largest investment in detention and deportation in US history. A mandatory quota of 3,000 arrests per day. Federal immigration enforcement spending growing from $20 billion in 2017 to $54.3 billion in 2025 — the fastest-growing public expense in the entire criminal justice sector.
Policing budgets rose $58 billion. Corrections spending rose $24.8 billion. This while the correctional population was actually shrinking by over a million people.
More money. Fewer people. That’s the business model.
GEO Group’s CEO told investors they were “built for this unique moment.” CoreCivic’s CEO called it “one of the most exciting periods in my career.”
When a prison CEO is excited about government policy, ask yourself what that policy is doing to human beings.
The Machine Feeds Itself
Here’s the loop, drawn clean:
1. Outlaw something with inelastic demand — meaning people will do it regardless of legal status. Drugs. Alcohol in the 1920s. Currently: migrating to survive.
2. The illegal market explodes because demand doesn’t disappear, it just goes underground. Criminal networks fill the void. Violence becomes the only contract enforcement mechanism since you can’t sue your drug dealer. Prices rise, quality control vanishes, people die.
3. The state funds a massive enforcement apparatus to chase the problem it created. Billions in police, courts, prosecutors, prisons.
4. The enforcement apparatus becomes a constituency. It lobbies for harsher laws to justify its own budget. Private companies build business models around guaranteed “clients.” Politicians run on “tough on crime” platforms funded by those same companies.
5. Repeat.
This isn’t a conspiracy theory. It’s a structural incentive problem that researchers, economists, and criminologists have documented for decades. You don’t need shadowy meetings in backrooms. You just need profit motive, political donation systems, and human beings acting in their own institutional interests.
The result is a machine that produces the crime it claims to fight — and charges you for the privilege.
The Missing Link: The Endgame Is Your Wallet
Here’s what most people miss when they talk about the drug war, shadow economies, and criminalization.
It’s not just about prisons. It’s not just about drugs. It’s about financial control — and that’s where the story gets modern.
As long as cash exists, the shadow economy exists. You can run a black market in cash. You can tip in cash. You can pay someone under the table in cash. You can buy things the state disapproves of in cash. Cash is anonymous. Cash is sovereign. Cash is ungovernable.
Currently, 146 countries representing 98% of global GDP are exploring Central Bank Digital Currencies — CBDCs. China’s digital yuan has already processed $2.3 trillion in transactions. 41 pilot programs are running globally. Three countries have fully launched.
What is a CBDC?
It is programmable money. Government-issued, government-controlled digital currency where — and this is the part they say quietly in policy documents — every transaction can be instantly visible to the state and subject to real-time rules set by unelected bureaucrats.
Central bankers and academics openly discuss “programmable money” that can expire, be restricted to certain merchants, or be blocked from purchasing disfavored goods. Iraq’s financial advisor to the prime minister said CBDCs would allow them to “enhance control over financial flows” and track “spending trends.”
That’s not innovation. That’s a financial panopticon.
Combine this with the logic we’ve been tracing:
They build shadow economies by outlawing inelastic human behaviors
They use the shadow economies to justify enforcement infrastructure
The enforcement infrastructure expands surveillance and state power
When cash — the last refuge of informal economic sovereignty — becomes digital and programmable, the shadow economy collapses because there’s nowhere left to hide
And then the state, having created the crisis for fifty years, rushes in as the savior with total financial visibility
You went from “won’t someone think of the children and the drug dealers” to “we control every transaction you make” in one generation.
This is not paranoia. This is the stated architecture of systems being built right now.
The Monty Python Interlude
(Because if we don’t laugh, we scream)
SCENE: A Government Policy Meeting, 1971
OFFICIAL 1: We need to solve the drug problem.
OFFICIAL 2: Brilliant. Let’s make all drugs illegal.
OFFICIAL 1: That’ll stop people from doing drugs.
OFFICIAL 2: Definitely. And if it doesn’t stop them?
OFFICIAL 1: Then we arrest them. Build more prisons.
OFFICIAL 2: And if the prisons get full?
OFFICIAL 1: Privatize them. Good for the economy.
OFFICIAL 2: And if crime goes up anyway?
OFFICIAL 1: More police. More surveillance.
OFFICIAL 2: And if the whole system costs a hundred billion a year and solves nothing?
OFFICIAL 1: (long pause) ...Digital currency.
OFFICIAL 2: Obviously.
[APPLAUSE]
Three Layers
Surface Layer — What They Tell You: The War on Drugs protects communities from dangerous substances and violent criminal networks. Enforcement is necessary to maintain public safety. Private industry involvement brings efficiency to public services.
Blind Spot — What The Data Shows: Prohibition creates the criminal networks it claims to fight. The US incarceration rate tripled after 1980 — not because Americans became three times more criminal, but because drug laws manufactured three times more criminals. Portugal decriminalized everything and got safer. The private prison industry grew 1,600% on the back of drug war policy it actively lobbied for. $90 billion per year flows into enforcement of a policy that demonstrably doesn’t work.
The Reframe — What It Actually Is: A structural extraction system. It takes something people will do anyway, makes it illegal, generates criminal networks, uses those networks to justify enforcement spending, profits from the enforcement, and uses the remaining chaos to justify the next layer of control. The endgame isn’t stopping drugs. The endgame is the infrastructure of control built while chasing them — surveillance, incarceration, financial monitoring — and the ultimate convergence of those systems in programmable money.
What Portugal Actually Proved (And What Oregon Got Wrong)
Portugal’s success had two components that are always separated in popular discussion but cannot be separated in practice:
First: Decriminalize personal use. Stop arresting people for what they do to their own bodies.
Second: Take every euro saved from not arresting people and put it into treatment, harm reduction, and social support.
Oregon tried the first component without the second. They decriminalized in 2020, then reversed in 2024 after overdose deaths rose. Not because decriminalization failed — but because they didn’t fund the replacement infrastructure.
The lesson isn’t “decriminalization doesn’t work.” The lesson is: you can’t just remove the punishment without building the support. Portugal understood that. Oregon politicians wanted the good headline without the investment.
This distinction matters enormously because it’s how genuine reform gets discredited — implement half the model, watch it stumble, declare the whole idea failed, return to the enforcement machine.
What We Actually Save
Let’s be precise about the five-year low-impact narcotics scenario from where we started:
Direct enforcement savings (US alone):
Police time reallocated from cannabis arrests: billions in labor hours
Prosecution costs eliminated: federal + state courts
Incarceration costs: $30,000 per inmate per year × hundreds of thousands of people
Harvard/Cato estimates: $41–49 billion annually in enforcement savings just from full legalization
Cannabis alone: $7.7 billion per year in enforcement savings + $6 billion in potential tax revenue
Over five years, conservatively: $200–250 billion in the US alone.
What else you get:
Hospital resources freed from treating violence related to drug market territorial disputes
Police resources redirected to actual violent crime
Communities not destroyed by incarceration of non-violent members
Tax revenue from a regulated market that currently funds criminal networks
Reduced HIV transmission, reduced overdose deaths (see: Portugal)
What you lose:
Prison industry profit margins
Police union budget justifications
The political utility of “tough on crime” rhetoric
The surveillance infrastructure built to chase drug markets
Note which column the powerful people in this story are on.
Grandmother’s Algorithm
My grandmother, up in the Arctic Circle, had a simple framework: Pay attention. Do your best. Pay it forward.
Pay attention: The data on the drug war has been clear for 40 years. The Portugal experiment has been running for 25. The private prison profit motive has been documented, lobbied openly, donated publicly. The CBDC architecture is being built in plain sight by 146 governments. None of this is hidden. It requires only the willingness to look.
Do your best: The best thing any of us can do is refuse the framing. Refuse the idea that the choice is between “drug chaos” and “total enforcement.” Refuse the idea that the only alternative to the black economy is the surveillance economy. There is a third option — it involves treating people as human beings, accepting that some behaviors are health issues rather than crimes, and investing in support rather than punishment. It’s been done. It works.
Pay it forward: Share this. Not because it’s comfortable, but because the people who built this machine are counting on most people never connecting these dots. The drug war creates the prison industry creates the surveillance apparatus creates the programmable money creates total financial control. That’s the chain. Once you see it, you can’t unsee it.
And once enough people see it, the machine loses its power to operate in the dark.
The Quantum Skald’s Closing Note
We are living through the final chapters of a fifty-year project to manufacture dependency — not on drugs, but on enforcement. The black economy isn’t a failure of policy. It’s a feature of policy. Every shadow economy needs a light to cast it. That light is the state. And the state, increasingly, is monetized by the people who profit from the shadow.
The good news: the shadow economy has been shrinking — from 17.7% of global GDP in 2000 to 11.8% in 2023. Not because enforcement worked. Because people found legitimate ways to participate in economic life when given the chance.
That’s the real signal. Given the choice between shadow and light, most people choose light. The question is whether the people who profit from darkness will let them.
Portugal said yes.
The prison-industrial complex is saying no.
The CBDC architects are offering a third option: a light so total it casts no shadows at all — because it watches everything.
Between those three futures, only one involves human dignity.
We know which one to build.
Facts No Spin
Global shadow economy: $12–13 trillion annually (11.8% of global GDP) — EY Global Shadow Economy Report 2025
US shadow economy: $1.4 trillion (5% of GDP)
Global drug enforcement cost: $100 billion+ per year
Estimated annual US savings from legalization: $41–49 billion (Cato Institute / Harvard economist Jeffrey Miron)
Potential annual US tax revenue from taxed legal drugs: $46.7 billion
Portugal drug arrest reduction post-decriminalization: 73%
Portugal overdose death reduction: 93% (80 per million → 6 per million)
Portugal HIV infection share from drug use: 50% → 1.68%
Private prison industry growth 1984–2004: 1,600%
US federal immigration/detention spending growth: $20 billion (2017) → $54.3 billion (2025)
CBDCs under development globally: 146 countries (98% of global GDP)
China digital yuan transactions to December 2025: $2.3 trillion
Swish: 0729990300 Support the work: buymeacoffee.com/cognitiveloon More at: hejon07.substack.com
If this resonated with you, a like or comment goes a long way. It tells the algorithm this matters — and helps it find the people who need to hear it too. Think of it as passing the torch. 🙏
Peace, Love and Respect 🙏 Hans — The Quantum Skald All is One — returning to Source as Sovereign Light
Wonderful analogies to naturally enlighten…like the sun…with no meddling of middling payments!!-)
✨💙