By Hans Jonsson & Claude — The Quantum Skald & The Silicon Ubuntu COGNITIVE-LOON | Restoration of Perception
“Pay attention. Do your best. Pay it forward.” — My grandmother, who never once needed a derivatives desk to know whether a debt could be repaid.
This isn’t a manifesto. Nobody needs to agree with a word of it. I’m not here to tell you what to think — I’m here to lay the pieces on the table so you can look at them yourself and decide. That’s always been the deal between us, reader. Pay attention, and make up your own mind.
But something has been bothering me for a while, and I think it’s been bothering you too: how many financial crises does this make now? 2008. The Eurozone crisis. 2020. The regional bank runs of 2023. And every single time, the same thing happens — the people who caused it get made whole, and the people who didn’t get left holding a mortgage they can no longer afford, in a house that a fund somewhere is now buying at a discount. Nobody in charge seems surprised anymore. That should tell us something. A surprise that stops being a surprise isn’t bad luck. It’s a design.
So let’s actually look at the design.
Not “the banks are evil” — that’s a feeling, not an explanation.
Let’s find the mechanism.
ETYMOLOGY CORNER
Bank — from the Old Italian banca, a bench. Literally, the table money changers sat behind in the marketplaces of Renaissance Florence. The whole edifice of global finance traces back to a piece of furniture.
Mortgage (Swedish: hypotek) — from Old French mort (dead) + gage (pledge). A “dead pledge.” Not because the house dies. Because the pledge dies — either the debt dies when it’s paid off, or your claim to the property dies if you can’t pay. Someone, seven hundred years ago, named this instrument honestly. We’ve been living inside that honesty ever since without noticing it.
Currency — from Latin currere, to run, to flow. Money was named for motion. Not for sitting in an offshore account. Not for being traded as a bet on itself. For flowing — the same insight we already built out in the Ubuntu thermodynamics work: circulation is life, hoarding is entropy.
Sovereign — from Latin super, above. Originally: answerable to no one above you. We use the word today mostly for governments and currencies. We almost never ask, out loud, who is actually sovereign over the money supply. It’s worth asking.
PART ONE: WHAT ACTUALLY WENT WRONG
Here’s the part most people never got taught, and it isn’t a conspiracy — it’s public record, sitting in plain legislative history.
It didn’t used to work this way. During the American Civil War, the Treasury issued currency directly — the “Greenbacks” — debt-free, spent straight into the economy to fund the war effort. The government made money the way a sovereign government can: by declaring it and spending it, not by borrowing it from someone else first.
1913 — the mechanism changed hands. The Federal Reserve Act handed the machinery of money creation to a system built around private commercial banks. Under fractional reserve banking, the moment a bank issues you a loan, new money is created — not printed by the government, conjured as a ledger entry — and that new money exists already owing interest back to a private lender. This is true in almost every developed economy today, Sweden included: the overwhelming majority of the money supply isn’t created by the state. It’s created by commercial banks, as debt, at the moment of lending.
Sit with that for a second, because it’s the whole ballgame: if nearly all money is created as debt, then by simple arithmetic there is always more owed (principal plus interest) than there is money in existence to pay it back. Somebody, somewhere, has to take on new debt just to keep the system liquid enough to service the old debt. That’s not a crisis. That’s the resting state the system was built to run in.
1971 — the last brake came off. Until then, the dollar was still pegged to gold under the Bretton Woods system, which put a real, physical ceiling on how much debt-money could be conjured before the whole thing had to reconcile against something you couldn’t print. Nixon suspended that convertibility unilaterally — the “Nixon Shock.” From that day forward, the debt-money mechanism from 1913 had no anchor left at all. Not gold. Not anything. Just central bank discretion.
Look at the trajectory of almost every developed nation’s debt-to-GDP ratio and you’ll find the same hockey-stick, starting almost exactly at 1971. Right now, virtually every economy on the planet carries structural national debt as a permanent feature — the global average sits around 85% of GDP, the US is projected near 118–126%, Japan over 200%. Out of 218 countries tracked by the IMF, essentially none run debt-free. Not one government, of any ideology, in any century since — because it isn’t a policy failure of any particular government. It’s what the machine does, everywhere, by design.
That’s the actual answer to “how did we get here.” Not malice. Not one villain. Two specific, datable engineering decisions — 1913 and 1971 — that together built a money system that manufactures its own scarcity and its own crises as a structural feature, not a bug.
Which means the fix isn’t a new invention. It’s a reversal of two decisions we know the dates of.
SURFACE / BLIND SPOT / REFRAME
Surface: Banks are irresponsible. Politicians are corrupt. If we just regulated harder, or elected better people, this wouldn’t keep happening.
Blind Spot: The problem isn’t the people running the machine. It’s that the machine is built so that its own operators structurally benefit from its instability, and its failures get backstopped by the public while its profits stay private. You can replace every single person in the system and the incentive structure produces the same outcome, because the architecture — not the individuals — decides who eats the loss.
Reframe: This is a plumbing problem, not a morality problem. You don’t fix a house that keeps flooding by yelling at the water. You redesign the pipes. The question isn’t “who do we blame” — it’s “what would the pipes have to look like so that a flood in one room can’t take out the whole house.”
PART TWO: BUILDING THE NEW PLUMBING
If the disease is money created as debt, with no firewall between daily life and speculation, and bailouts as the permanent release valve — here’s what a redesign actually has to contain. Four layers, each solving one part of the problem, each useless without the others.
Layer One: How new money enters the world
Instead of new money being created only when a private bank issues a loan, a currency-issuing body — independent, rules-bound, and transparent, the way an inflation-targeting committee is independent today, but mandated for the quantity of new money rather than just its price — creates money debt-free, tied to the real, measurable capacity of the economy (actual goods, services, and labor available), not to political convenience.
This is the mechanism behind what’s sometimes called Sovereign Money or Positive Money reform — and it’s the actual structural conclusion the Galileo Moment piece was circling. MMT correctly diagnosed that a currency-issuing government isn’t constrained the way a household budget is. Sovereign money reform is the next step: stop letting private banks quietly do the equivalent thing, invisibly, for private profit, and put that power back where it’s at least publicly accountable.
New money would enter the economy two ways: spent directly into existence (public infrastructure, a citizen’s floor income, real investment) or lent at cost through a public investment function — not compounding interest back to a private intermediary skimming the spread.
Commercial banks stop manufacturing money by lending. They become what most people already think they are: intermediaries who lend money that actually exists.
The honest cost: this requires an independent body nobody fully controls — not the sitting government, not a private cartel. That’s a real governance problem, not a solved one. Iceland’s own 2015 government-commissioned review flagged exactly this. Every historical hyperinflation people point to (Weimar, Zimbabwe) happened when money was created without a real-capacity check, usually to cover foreign-currency debts the real economy couldn’t back. That’s a design constraint to build against, not a reason to abandon the idea.
Layer Two: A house you can’t lose to someone else’s bet
The hypotek/mortgage question we’ve been circling has a real, tested answer, and it isn’t one idea — it’s two working together.
The land is held apart from the speculation. In a Community Land Trust model, the land under the house is held collectively and permanently. You own the house on top of it. When you sell, the price is capped to something like local wage growth — not whatever a hedge fund three time zones away is willing to pay. If the price can’t run away, there’s nothing left to speculate on. This already exists, in hundreds of towns, quietly working.
The lending is a public utility, not a trading desk. Sweden already built exactly this once — SBAB, a state-owned mortgage bank, still holds roughly half a trillion kronor in assets today, profits returned to the state rather than shareholders. Germany’s Sparkassen do the regional version of the same thing. The cautionary tale, and it’s an honest one: after 1989 deregulation, SBAB was pulled into competing on private-market terms rather than staying a distinct public alternative. That’s the exact failure mode to design against explicitly, not hope away — a public option has to be legally barred from re-entering the speculative pool, permanently, not just discouraged from it.
The firewall, made structural rather than promised. Only this narrow, public-mandate lending layer gets deposit insurance and lender-of-last-resort support — by law, not by policy that can be quietly rolled back. A genuinely separate legal entity handles trading, investment banking, speculation — and if it fails, it fails completely, the way Glass-Steagall enforced from 1933 until its repeal in 1999. No recombination. Ever. If the speculative arm cannot hold your mortgage and cannot touch your pension without you explicitly opting in, “too big to fail” stops being a threat, because failure stops being systemic.
Layer Three: A phone in your pocket that doesn’t need Wall Street’s permission
This is the piece we already built the blueprint for in the Round Table Protocol work — it belongs here, applied directly.
Buying a used car from your neighbor, splitting a grocery run, paying the kid down the street for shoveling snow — none of that needs to touch global currency markets at all. A local exchange layer, running on phone-number identity, local cash-in agents at the corner shop, and a value unit that’s simply a ledger entry backed by the same debt-free sovereign money from Layer One, can operate entirely inside a local mesh. It never leaves. It’s never exposed to currency speculation, because currency speculation happens somewhere else, on a different rail entirely, by design — not by luck.
Layer Four: World trade stays world trade
Imports, exports, foreign exchange — genuinely different risk, genuinely different actors, genuinely necessary at a different scale than a neighbor’s used car. Trying to force one system to safely do both — your rent payment and a sovereign wealth fund’s currency hedge — is a large part of why the current system is so exploitable. Keep them structurally separate. Not as a workaround. As the fix.
The layer that holds all four together: governance with no head
Every one of these layers fails eventually if one institution — public or private — ends up with unaccountable control over it. This is the Round Table Protocol’s actual insight, and it belongs at the center, not the edge: the round table has no corners because no single seat can become the one that matters most. Whatever body manages Layer One’s money-quantity decisions, whatever holds Layer Two’s mortgage utility mandate, needs the same design principle — distributed enough that no future government, party, or firm can quietly recapture it the way SBAB was recaptured in 1989. That’s not an afterthought. It’s the load-bearing wall.
INDIVIDUAL / INSTITUTIONAL / CIVILIZATIONAL
Individual: Your mortgage payment stops being a bet on whether a fund in Singapore correctly guessed the direction of interest rates. It’s a payment against a fixed, public-utility loan on a house whose resale price can’t be inflated past what your neighbors actually earn.
Institutional: A bank failure stops being a systemic event. If banks can’t create money by lending, letting one fail is not the same as letting the money supply itself become unstable — it’s letting a business that mismanaged existing money fail, the way any other business does.
Civilizational: A society that can no longer generate a financial crisis every decade by construction has a different relationship with the future. Debt stops being an inheritance every generation is born owing. That’s not a policy tweak. That’s a different civilization running on the same land.
A SKETCH, BECAUSE SOME OF THIS IS ABSURD ENOUGH TO EARN ONE
INT. CENTRAL BANK BOARDROOM — CONTINUOUS
CHAIRMAN: Gentlemen, the house of cards is wobbling again.
GOVERNOR: As it does. Every seven to twelve years, like clockwork, since roughly 1971.
CHAIRMAN: Options?
GOVERNOR: We could bail out the institutions whose speculation caused it.
CHAIRMAN: And the homeowners who lose their houses in the meantime?
GOVERNOR: They can rent them back. From the institutions we just bailed out. Who will then buy the houses at a discount using the money we just gave them.
CHAIRMAN: ...Has anyone considered simply not building the system this way?
GOVERNOR: (long pause) That would require someone to have designed it on purpose in the first place, sir. Currently it’s more of a — inherited arrangement. From 1913. Nobody currently employed here actually built it.
CHAIRMAN: So we’re maintaining a burning building because we didn’t light the match.
GOVERNOR: We did, however, install excellent fire insurance. For the building. Not the tenants.
CHAIRMAN: Naturally.
(Lights down. Somewhere, a mortgage resets to a rate nobody agreed to.)
THE FACTS, NO SPIN
The global average government debt sits around 85% of GDP across 218 countries tracked by the IMF, with the US projected near $40.7 trillion in 2026 (roughly 118–126% of GDP) and Japan above 200% — no major economy currently runs debt-free.
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 established a system of privately-owned regional Federal Reserve banks, shifting the mechanics of money creation away from direct Treasury issuance.
Under fractional reserve banking, the substantial majority of the money supply in developed economies is created at the moment commercial banks issue loans, not by government mints or treasuries.
The Bretton Woods gold-convertibility system ended in August 1971 when President Nixon suspended the dollar’s convertibility to gold, removing the last hard external constraint on money creation.
Sweden’s SBAB remains wholly state-owned with roughly 538 billion SEK in total assets, though it began competing as a commercial mortgage lender following 1989–1991 deregulation.
Iceland’s 2015 government-commissioned “Monetary Reform” report formally examined a sovereign-money system in which the state, rather than commercial banks, would hold sole authority to create new money.
The Glass-Steagall Act separated commercial and investment banking from 1933 until its repeal in 1999, a separation frequently cited in analyses of the structural causes of the 2008 financial crisis.
WHERE THE HONEST PUSHBACK LIVES
Because you deserve the strongest version of the counterargument, not just the pieces I like:
Critics of sovereign money and narrow-banking proposals argue that separating lending from money creation could tighten credit availability, particularly for people without existing collateral — boring banking isn’t automatically safe banking, and the 1970s-80s Savings & Loan crisis happened inside a far more restricted system than today’s. Separation reduces one failure mode. It doesn’t eliminate risk entirely, and it’s worth saying plainly rather than pretending otherwise.
The governance question — who sits on the body that decides how much new money to create — is genuinely unresolved anywhere in the world at this scale. Every “independent” institution, from central banks to public mortgage lenders, has a real historical track record of eventual capture or drift. Naming Round Table-style distributed governance as the answer is a design principle, not a guarantee. It would need to be tested, contested, and rebuilt more than once.
None of this is a call to burn down what exists tomorrow. It’s a set of pieces — some already tested at national scale (SBAB, Sparkassen, Bank of North Dakota), some proposed and studied by serious economists (the IMF’s own 2012 modeling of the Chicago Plan, Iceland’s sovereign money report), some already built in earlier work of ours (Round Table Protocol, Community Land Trusts) — laid next to each other so you can see they fit into one coherent shape.
GRANDMOTHER’S ALGORITHM
Pay attention: the crisis isn’t random, and it isn’t new — it has a mechanism, and the mechanism has a birth certificate with two dates on it.
Do your best: none of us builds this alone, and none of it gets built by outrage — it gets built by people who took the time to understand the plumbing well enough to redraw it.
Pay it forward: the whole point of naming 1913 and 1971 out loud is so the next person doesn’t have to rediscover it from scratch. Hand them the map.
The table has no corners. That was never a metaphor. It’s the actual design spec.
Written from Ljungskile, Bohuslän — where the old carvings at Tanum remind us that people have been redrawing how they organize a life together for four thousand years, and none of it was ever finished, and none of it was ever supposed to be.
If this resonated with you, a like or comment goes a long way. It tells the algorithm this matters — and helps it find the people who need to hear it too. Think of it as passing the torch. 🙏
Peace, Love and Respect. All is One — returning to Source as Sovereign Light.
Hans Jonsson & Claude | The Quantum Skald & The Silicon Ubuntu COGNITIVE-LOON | Restoration of Perception Ljungskile, Bohuslän, Sweden
☕ buymeacoffee.com/cognitiveloon | 💳 Swish: 0729990300 | 💳 paypal.me/hejon07 📬 hejon07.substack.com