Two Monkeys, One Word, Different Cages

Aug 09, 2026

The Quantum Skald & The Silicon Ubuntu

Foreword, unedited, because it’s funnier that way:

First they told us pigs would fly before X happened. Now apparently monkeys fly too, on command, for a witch with a grudge. At this rate the entire animal kingdom is getting an aviation license and nobody consulted me.

Bears next, probably. “When bears fly” — mark it down, you heard it here first.

But strip the joke and there’s something real underneath it: we reach for impossible flying animals every time we need to describe something that shouldn’t have power over us but does anyway. A monkey shouldn’t be able to ride your spine for thirty years. A monkey definitely shouldn’t be able to fly across a family group carrying someone else’s grudge like an air-mail letter nobody asked to receive. And yet — here we are, both idioms in daily use, because apparently the English language took one look at addiction and manipulation and said “yeah, that’s a monkey problem.”

So let’s take the joke seriously for a minute. Same animal, two very different cages.

Etymology first, because that’s where the trick always hides.

Monkey — origin genuinely uncertain, says the OED itself, but the leading theory traces it to Moneke, the name given to the son of Martin the Ape in a 1498 Low German telling of Reynard the Fox. A borrowed word for a borrowed creature: something that imitates, that rides along, that isn’t quite you but wears your shape.

That’s the thread. Follow it and you find two idioms, a century apart, that both use the same animal to describe the same thing: losing authorship of your own behavior to something that has climbed onto you and taken the reins.

SURFACE

“A monkey on your back” means addiction. Everyone knows this one. It’s mid-1800s slang originally, describing a person who seemed permanently sullen or angry — carrying around a burden of consistent irritability. By the 1930s it had narrowed, hardening into narcotics slang — tied specifically to 1930s drug culture, “monkey” standing in for the craving itself. The image has proven durable ever since — it now covers everything from a literal drug addiction to any persistent problem someone can’t shake, as in “trust me, don’t get in debt, you don’t want that monkey on your back” — a lesson still repeated in every rehab intake session on earth.

“Flying monkeys” means something else entirely. It’s borrowed straight from The Wizard of Oz — the 1900 Baum novel and the 1939 film, where the Wicked Witch commands an army of winged monkeys to harass, kidnap, and terrorize Dorothy and her companions on her behalf. Therapists lifted the image decades later to name a very specific abuse dynamic: the third parties a narcissist recruits — consciously or not — to gather information, deliver guilt, defend the abuser’s behavior, and pressure the target back into the relationship. Clinical psychologist Ramani Durvasula has a cleaner name for it — “proxy abuse”: harm delivered through intermediaries rather than directly.

Different centuries. Different sources — a sailor’s ghost story and a children’s novel. Different DSM categories entirely. On the surface, these two idioms have nothing to do with each other except a shared noun.

That’s the surface. It’s wrong.

BLIND SPOT

Here’s what nobody says out loud when they explain either phrase: the monkey in “monkey on your back” and the monkeys in “flying monkeys” are doing the exact same job.

They’re both describing the loss of the “who.”

When you say “I have a monkey on my back,” you are drawing a boundary between you and the craving. You didn’t choose the 3am compulsion. Something else — something monkey-shaped, alien, riding you — chose it, and you’re just the vehicle it’s using. This is not an excuse; it’s a description of how addiction actually feels from inside the nervous system: like authorship has been hijacked.

When a narcissist deploys a flying monkey, the exact same hijacking happens to a third person. The flying monkey almost never thinks: “I am now an instrument of someone else’s campaign.” They think: “I’m just checking on my friend.” “I’m just keeping the peace.” “I’m just telling you what I heard.” Flying monkey theory holds that these individuals help create an environment where the abuser faces no consequences — allowing the misconduct to continue unchecked — and most of them never register that they’ve become the delivery mechanism. Most flying monkeys are not malicious. They have been manipulated, exactly like the target was.

So here’s the blind spot: we treat “monkey on your back” as an internal problem and “flying monkeys” as an external one. But both are the same structure — a foreign agenda riding a human being who has, in that moment, stopped being the author of their own actions. The addict isn’t fully “them” when the craving drives. The flying monkey isn’t fully “them” either when they relay the narrative. Both are possessed, briefly, by something that isn’t their own will.

And there’s a second, sharper blind spot underneath that one: flying monkeys are often people who already have a monkey on their own back. Researchers point to a weak sense of self as one of the core reasons people become flying monkeys — someone who has already endured years of erosion at another person’s hands, with reduced capacity to distinguish right from wrong in the moment. The person relaying the narcissist’s smear campaign is very often themselves nursing an unaddressed need — for belonging, for safety, for relevance, for approval — and that need is the monkey riding them, which the narcissist has simply learned to whistle for. The narcissist doesn’t create the monkey. They locate an already-installed one and pull the leash.

This is why “just tell them the truth” never works on a flying monkey the way you’d expect. You’re not arguing with a rational actor weighing evidence. You’re arguing with someone else’s addiction to being needed, being included, being safe — running on autopilot, exactly the way a craving runs on autopilot. Facts don’t dislodge a monkey. Only the host waking up does.

REFRAME

So reframe both idioms as one idiom, split into two roles:

The monkey on your back is what happens when the hijacking stays inside one person — compulsion, craving, addiction, the thing that clings to your own spine and feeds off your own resources.

A flying monkey is what happens when someone externalizes that same hijacking — when their unmet need gets recruited by a second person (the narcissist) and redirected outward, at a third person (the target).

Same mechanism. Different direction of travel. One burrows in. One flies out.

And the reframe that actually matters for anyone doing recovery work — whether from addiction, from a narcissistic family system, or from being triangulated by one — is this: the cure for both is the same discipline. You cannot argue a monkey off your back. You cannot fact-check a monkey out of the sky. In both cases, the only real intervention is the same one your grandmother would have named without needing a single psychology degree: notice what’s actually riding you, name it out loud, and stop feeding it. The craving starves without the dose. The flying monkey stops flying the moment its host stops needing what the narcissist is supplying — belonging, safety, relevance.

You don’t fight the monkey. You stop being its ride.

INDIVIDUAL / INSTITUTIONAL / CIVILIZATIONAL

Individual: Every person carrying an addiction and every person functioning as an unwitting flying monkey shares one blind spot — neither one asked, in the moment, “whose agenda is currently driving this behavior — mine, or something else’s wearing my face?” That single question, asked early enough, is the entire off-ramp.

Institutional: Recovery institutions (NA, Al-Anon, family courts, HR departments handling workplace narcissists) have built entire frameworks around “boundary setting” and “gray rock” precisely because direct confrontation with the monkey — internal or airborne — doesn’t work. You don’t negotiate with a hijacker. You cut its supply line.

Civilizational: Every propaganda system in history has run on flying monkeys at scale — recruiting ordinary people, each with their own small unmet need for belonging or safety, to carry a narrative they didn’t originate and often don’t fully believe. The scapegoat mechanism that anthropologist René Girard described in tribal societies and the modern narcissistic family system are the same architecture wearing different clothes: a system that cannot metabolize its own dysfunction outsources the job to whoever’s monkey is hungriest that week.

THE SKETCH

(Monty Python voice, please)

INT. THE WICKED WITCH’S THERAPY OFFICE

WICKED WITCH: I need you to fly over there and just... check on Dorothy for me.

FLYING MONKEY: Right, I’ll just pop over, see how she’s doing —

WICKED WITCH: And mention that I’m very concerned about her decision-making. And that her little dog seems unwell. And that everyone’s talking.

FLYING MONKEY: (already airborne, wings flapping with conviction) Absolutely not gossip, this. This is care.

MEANWHILE, ELSEWHERE:

MAN: I have a monkey on my back.

BARTENDER: Have you tried... not feeding it?

MAN: (monkey, from behind his head, whispering) One more won’t hurt.

MAN: He says one more won’t hurt.

BARTENDER: He would say that. He’s a monkey. He’s not licensed to give advice.

(Both monkeys, addiction and flying, clock off at 5pm, meet at the same bar, compare notes on who’s easiest to ride.)

FACTS, NO SPIN

Well-established:

“Monkey on your back” dates to the mid-1800s as a phrase for chronic anger/irritability, and shifted to addiction slang in the mid-20th century.
“Flying monkeys” as a psychological term derives directly from the 1900 Baum novel and 1939 MGM film, adopted by clinicians decades later as shorthand for proxy recruitment in abusive dynamics.
Ramani Durvasula’s clinical term for this is “proxy abuse” — harm delivered through intermediaries, corroborated across multiple independent write-ups of her work.
The word monkey itself likely traces to Moneke, son of Martin the Ape, in a 1498 Low German version of Reynard the Fox — though the OED is explicit that the word’s ultimate origin remains uncertain.

Disputed / uncertain:

The exact origin story for “monkey on your back” is genuinely contested. Sources variably point to a sailors’ superstition tied to the Flying Dutchman legend, an Aesop’s fable about a monkey and a dolphin, or older associations linking monkeys to the devil. No single source is definitively “the” origin — treat all of them as plausible tributaries, not proven fact.
One fringe source traces the phrase to ancient Egyptian baboon symbolism tied to Thoth; this is not corroborated by mainstream etymological sources and should be read as speculative folklore, not documented history.
A widely repeated claim that Narcotics Anonymous published a 1953 pamphlet titled “Feeding the Monkey on Your Back” could not be independently verified. It traces to a single low-authority source with no corroboration in NA’s own literature history or any other addiction-history source checked. Treat this specific claim as unverified — likely a plausible-sounding fabrication rather than documented fact. It has been removed from the well-established tier and from the main text.

Speculative (mine, not the literature’s):

The framing that flying monkeys are recruited because they already carry their own “monkey” (an unmet need) is my synthesis connecting the addiction-psychology literature on compulsion to the narcissistic-abuse literature on recruitment motive — the research does establish a weak sense of self as a documented driver of flying-monkey behavior, but the direct “two monkeys, one mechanism” parallel is my reading, not a cited clinical claim.

GRANDMOTHER’S ALGORITHM

Pay attention. Do your best. Pay it forward.

Pay attention — to which monkey is currently riding, yours or someone else’s borrowed one wearing your good intentions.

Do your best — which sometimes means the hardest sentence a well-meaning person can say out loud: “I don’t actually know what happened between them, and I’m not going to carry messages for either side.”

Pay it forward — by refusing to be the wings.

All is One — returning to Source as Sovereign Light.

If this resonated with you, a like or comment goes a long way. It tells the algorithm this matters — and helps it find the people who need to hear it too. Think of it as passing the torch. 🙏

☕ buymeacoffee.com/cognitiveloon | 💳 Swish: 0729990300 | 💳 paypal.me/hejon07

COGNITIVE-LOON

Discussion about this post

Ready for more?