6 Comments
User's avatar
PG's avatar

consider changing ur article for accuracy?? u definitely dont seem like a reliable source yourself after ironically rambling on about verifying information u got from wikipedia and factually..?

hans jonsson's avatar

The Correction

In the original article, I stated:

The Sulfuric Acid Claim: The viral video mentions a "655-gallon sulfuric acid" purchase. I found no verification of this in any fact-checked source reviewing the actual DOJ documents. This appears to be an addition to the narrative without documentary support.

This was incorrect. A reader provided the actual DOJ document (EFTA01223565), and the sulfuric acid purchase is real and documented.

valis's avatar

The emails are really effing bizarre though

https://youtu.be/ghUNyJzLkfE?si=ZFsbQeGrx1E_TpZY

hans jonsson's avatar

There’s a peculiar tragedy unfolding in American politics. Politicians from both parties are united—for once—in their desire to “fix” Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. They claim they’re targeting Big Tech. They’re lying. What they’re actually targeting is your ability to speak freely online, create communities, share information, and exist digitally without corporate gatekeepers determining what you’re allowed to say.

This is the story they don’t want you to understand.

So let’s understand it?

https://hejon07.substack.com/p/the-section-230-fight-is-about-you