The improvisational nature of mind can free us from the tyranny!
The morning I realized my mind was an illusion, I was standing in line at a coffee shop, caught in a familiar argument with myself. The internal debate—whether to get the iced latte I craved or the green tea my "better self" preferred—felt like two distinct parts of me locked in combat. A self divided against itself.
The Gospel of Thomas: How Jesus Accidentally Started a Self-Help Movement (And Why the Church Hates It)
Author's Note: This piece was written before the tragic events of September 11, 2025. While the timing may seem inappropriate given recent events, I believe historical education and thoughtful critique of institutional power structures remain important. This exploration of early Christian texts is offered in the spirit of genuine inquiry, not controvers…
The Open Window: What Happens When Power Forgets Humility
In the Hebrew calendar, we recently entered the year 5785. The number is symbolized by the letter hey (ה), the fifth letter of the Hebrew alphabet. The shape of this letter resembles an open window—an invitation to look through and see things from a different perspective. Not your perspective. Not…
by The Quantum Skald & The Silicon Ubuntu | COGNITIVE-LOON | hejon07.substack.com
Etymology First
Insight — from Middle English inseen, literally “to see within.” Not “to see further.” Not “to see more.” In plus sight — vision aimed inward, at the thing doing the looking.
Compare that to how the “third eye” actually shows up across the traditions that use the phrase. The ajna chakra — Sanskrit ājñā, “command” or “perceiving” — sits at the point between the eyebrows in the yogic system, and it is described without exception as the seat of inner perception, not an additional window onto the world. Descartes, arriving at the same location from an entirely different tradition centuries later, named the pineal gland — the single unpaired structure sitting near the brain’s center, the one organ that isn’t duplicated left and right like almost everything else in the skull — “the seat of the soul.” Not because it looked outward better. Because it was the one place positioned to reconcile everything the two outward-facing eyes had gathered into a single, unified sense of self.
Nobody who actually studied this called the third eye a better telescope. They called it a mirror.
That distinction is the whole article.
Surface
Pop-spiritual culture has flattened the third eye into a superpower. Open it and you’ll see auras, read energy, spot liars, sense the future — an upgrade to your outward-facing senses, X-ray vision for the metaphysically inclined. It’s marketed the way any enhancement is marketed: more input, more range, more seeing further.
That’s the surface. And it gets the geometry backwards.
Blind Spot
Here’s the piece almost nobody connects, and it’s the same blind spot from the Seven Deadly Sins piece wearing a different hat.
Evagrius Ponticus didn’t write the Praktikos as a manual for spotting greed, wrath, and pride in other monks. He wrote it because he’d caught himself, repeatedly, mistaking his own unexamined hunger, grief, and humiliation for something the world was doing to him. The logismoi were a discipline of inward sight — noticing the thought as it formed, before it borrowed a costume and walked out into his behavior wearing someone else’s name.
That’s third-eye work. Not seeing further outward. Seeing clearly inward, so that what eventually gets pointed at the world isn’t a distortion wearing the disguise of clarity.
And this is where the failure mode actually lives — not in people who lack a third eye, but in people who never turned the one they have inward, and so aimed it outward instead, mistaking projection for perception. Projection is the precise clinical term for this, formalized by Freud as a defense mechanism and developed further by Jung into the concept of the shadow — the parts of the self a person hasn’t examined, which don’t disappear for being unexamined; they get relocated. Attributed to someone else. Seen “out there,” with total conviction, because the alternative is looking at where it actually originates.
A person who hasn’t done the inward work doesn’t experience this as guessing. They experience it as seeing clearly. That’s what makes it dangerous. Unexamined inner material doesn’t feel like a blind spot from the inside — it feels like 20/20 vision pointed at everyone else.
Reframe
Strip the mysticism back and the mechanism is almost boringly well-documented.
Interoception — the brain’s capacity to accurately sense its own internal states, tracked in neuroscience largely through activity in the insular cortex — is now understood as a prerequisite for accurate emotional regulation, not a side feature of it. People with poor interoceptive accuracy don’t lack emotions; they misattribute them. A racing heart from caffeine gets read as anxiety. Unprocessed grief gets read as irritation at a colleague. The internal signal is real. The read is wrong, and the error gets exported outward as a judgment about the world rather than a fact about the internal state.
This lines up exactly with the Hermetic axiom this whole publication takes its name from: as above, so below; as within, so without. Read plainly, without the mysticism, it’s a testable claim about attribution — what you haven’t looked at inside you becomes the story you tell about outside you. The anger you haven’t named becomes the anger you find everywhere. The shame you haven’t sat with becomes the judgment you hand out freely, with total confidence, to anyone who resembles the thing you’re avoiding.
Jung put it in language that’s aged well clinically: what you do not make conscious governs your life from the outside, and you call it fate. Contemporary work on projection and attribution bias says the same thing with different vocabulary — unexamined internal states reliably distort external judgment, and the person doing the distorting is usually the last to notice, because the distortion presents itself as insight rather than error.
This is the same mechanism the Seven Deadly Sins piece diagnosed from the outside — Evagrius’s logismoi recurring and hijacking behavior. This piece is just naming the organ responsible for catching them before they export. The third eye isn’t a better outward sensor. It’s the inward check that has to run first, or every outward reading comes back corrupted.
Individual / Institutional / Civilizational
Individual: The person who skips the inward look doesn’t become blind. They become falsely certain — mistaking their own unexamined grief, fear, or shame for an objective read on someone else’s character. That certainty is the tell. Real insight tends to arrive with some humility attached; projection arrives fully formed and outraged.
Institutional: Whole systems run on this shortcut. Outrage media doesn’t need you to look inward — it needs you to point outward, fast, with certainty, at a target it has already selected. It is, structurally, an industry built to prevent third-eye work, because a population doing the inward check first is a much harder population to mobilize on cue.
Civilizational: Every era’s favorite scapegoat has been, in part, a civilization’s unexamined shadow given a face and an address. The pattern Jung named individually scales up without much modification — a society that never turns its own third eye inward will reliably find somewhere outward to relocate what it hasn’t looked at.
The Sketch (Monty Python Voice)
[Scene: A hermitage. A MONK sits in meditation. A SEEKER bursts in, breathless.]
SEEKER: Master! I need my third eye opened! I need to see who’s really working against me at the office!
MONK (EVAGRIUS): Ah. And have you looked at what you’re carrying, before turning your sight outward?
SEEKER: No time for that — I can feel it, they’re plotting something, I just need better sight to prove it.
MONK: That feeling. Where does it live in you?
SEEKER: ...my chest. Tight. Since Tuesday.
MONK: And Tuesday?
SEEKER: (long pause) My brother didn’t call for my birthday.
MONK: Then perhaps the eye you’re asking me to open is not aimed at the office at all.
SEEKER: But I saw something. Clearly. I was sure.
MONK: (nodding, unsurprised) That is how it always feels, right before someone finds out it was a mirror the whole time.
Facts, No Spin
Insight, in its literal etymological construction, means “sight within” — inward vision, not extended outward vision.
The ajna chakra in the yogic tradition is consistently described as the seat of inner perception, associated with the point between the eyebrows.
Descartes identified the pineal gland — the brain’s one unpaired central structure — as the seat of the soul, the presumed point of integration between the body’s dual sensory inputs.
Projection is a formally defined psychological defense mechanism (Freud), further developed by Carl Jung into the concept of the shadow — unexamined internal material that gets unconsciously attributed to others rather than recognized as one’s own.
Interoception, tracked via the insular cortex, is the brain’s capacity to accurately read its own internal states; poor interoceptive accuracy is associated in the research literature with misattributed emotion and impaired emotional regulation.
The Hermetic axiom “as above, so below; as within, so without” is most widely known through The Kybalion (1908, attributed to “Three Initiates”), itself drawing on the older Hermetic tradition associated with the Emerald Tablet.
Grandmother’s Algorithm
Pay attention. Do your best. Pay it forward.
She never used the word “projection.” She’d have said it the plain way: before you point your finger at someone, check what your own hand is carrying. That’s the third eye, in one sentence. Not a better window on the world. A mirror you’re required to look into first.
This is Part Two of the eyes series — Part One measured the distance between you and what hurt you. This one measures the distance between who you are and who you think you are. Both eyes outward, one eye inward. That’s the whole instrument.
Sources & Further Reading
Sigmund Freud, foundational work on defense mechanisms, including projection
Carl Jung, Aion and related works on the shadow and individuation
Sarah N. Garfinkel et al., research on interoception and the insular cortex’s role in emotional regulation
The Kybalion (1908, “Three Initiates”) — popular source of the “as above, so below” Hermetic axiom
René Descartes, The Passions of the Soul — on the pineal gland as the seat of the soul
☕ buymeacoffee.com/cognitiveloon | 💳 Swish: 0729990300 | 💳 paypal.me/hejon07