The Tale of Two Volumes: Or How to Hide a Special Counsel Report in Plain Sight

A bedtime story about transparency, justice, and the art of saying "trust us, bro" with a straight face

The Setup: When Special Counsels Write Fan Fiction

Picture this: You're Jack Smith, Special Counsel extraordinaire. Your job? Investigate whether a former president maybe, possibly, allegedly did some things that were... let's call them "legally questionable."

After years of digging through evidence like a caffeinated archaeologist, you write a report. Not just any report—a TWO-VOLUME MASTERPIECE. Think of it as the Lord of the Rings of legal documents, except instead of destroying rings, we're talking about potentially destroying democracy. Fun!

Volume 1: "The Fellowship of the January 6th Investigation" ✅ Released Volume 2: "The Two Towers of Classified Documents" ❌ Sealed tighter than Fort Knox

What We Know (And What We're Not Allowed to Know)

Volume 1: The One They Let Us Read

Released in January 2025, right before Trump's inauguration (timing is everything, folks). This volume basically says: "Yeah, about that whole trying-to-overturn-an-election thing... we had enough evidence to probably convict the guy."

Direct quote from the report: Trump would have faced "probable conviction" if he hadn't won reelection.

Translation: "We had the receipts, but whoops, he's president again. Our bad!"

Volume 2: The Forbidden Tome

This is where it gets spicy. Volume 2 covers the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case—you know, the one where FBI agents found classified docs scattered around Trump's resort like really expensive confetti.

What's in it? According to journalists, it "details Trump's efforts to illegally withhold and conceal a large number of documents containing highly sensitive national security secrets."

But can you read it? Absolutely not! It's sealed by court order, protected like the Crown Jewels, except the Crown Jewels are actually on display.

The Official Excuse: "We're Protecting Trial Fairness"

Here's where the story gets beautifully absurd. The reason Volume 2 is locked away? Two Trump aides—Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira—still face charges. The DOJ says releasing the report would "prejudice their trials."

Let me get this straight: We can't learn about potential crimes by a former president because it might hurt the feelings of his alleged co-conspirators? That's like saying we can't discuss a bank robbery because the getaway driver hasn't been tried yet.

The Legal Logic:

• Releasing evidence = bad for defendants

• Keeping citizens ignorant = good for justice

• Makes perfect sense (if you're high)

The Players in This Cosmic Joke

Judge Aileen Cannon

The Trump-appointed judge blocking release

Judge Cannon has consistently ruled to keep Volume 2 sealed. She's the judicial equivalent of a bouncer at an exclusive club, except the club is "government transparency" and apparently, we're not on the list.

Her reasoning? Protecting trial fairness. Because nothing says "fair trial" like keeping the public completely in the dark about what their government discovered.

Merrick Garland

The Attorney General caught between a rock and a Trump

Garland actually WANTS to release more of the report. He even offered to show it to Congress under strict confidentiality (like sharing nudes but for government documents). But Judge Cannon said "nope" to even that compromise.

Imagine being so committed to transparency that you're willing to show classified information to Congress, and the judge is like, "Not even behind closed doors, buddy."

Trump & Friends

The beneficiaries of strategic amnesia

Trump's team is doing victory laps over keeping Volume 2 sealed. His AG nominee Todd Blanche called any potential release a "lawless political stunt."

The irony is thicker than molasses: The guy potentially being investigated for lawlessness is calling transparency... lawless. It's like a bank robber complaining that security cameras violate his privacy.

House Democrats

The kids with their faces pressed against the candy store window

Democrats want the full report released, arguing the public has a right to know. They've even suggested dismissing the pending cases just to free up the report.

Their logic: "Let's end these prosecutions so we can finally learn what crimes might have been committed." It's like canceling a murder trial so you can read the detective's notes.

The Beautiful Irony of It All

Here's what makes this situation peak 2025 America:

1. We have a report about government transparency that's not transparent

2. The evidence of potential obstruction is being... obstructed

3. We're protecting trial fairness by ensuring the public never learns what happened

4. The guy who allegedly mishandled classified docs is now president again, while his aides' trials prevent us from learning about it

It's like a Russian nesting doll of bureaucratic absurdity.

What Happens Next? (Spoiler: Probably Nothing)

The most likely scenario? Volume 2 stays buried forever. Trump's new DOJ will keep it sealed, the Florida cases will drag on indefinitely, and we'll all just have to trust that justice was served somewhere behind closed doors.

Future historians will write: "In 2025, America had a detailed account of potential presidential crimes, but decided collective ignorance was the path to justice. The end."

The Real Lesson Here

This isn't really about Jack Smith or Volume 2. It's about how power protects itself using the very systems designed to check it. The law becomes a shield instead of a sword, procedure becomes more important than truth, and "trust the process" becomes "trust us, you don't need to know."

We're watching the legal equivalent of "the dog ate my homework," except the dog is the justice system and the homework contains evidence of potential high crimes.

The most educational part? Learning that in America, you can commit crimes so effectively that investigating them becomes a crime against fairness.

Bottom line: Volume 2 exists. It's apparently damning. And you'll never read it. Democracy in action, folks.

---

Want more tales of institutional absurdity? Subscribe for weekly doses of reality that read like satire, because in 2025, the truth is stranger than fiction and twice as depressing.

---